Analysis of Motive and Effectiveness of Norway Foreign Aid Through Redd+ Scheme on Peat Forest Restoration In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53622/ij3pei.v3i2.199Keywords:
REDD , Foreign Aid, Effectiveness of Foreign Aid, Mechanism for Providing Funds, Self-Interest, Carbon EmissionsAbstract
Indonesia's 22.5 million hectares of peat forest, which is capable of storing 30% of the world's carbon dioxide, has attracted Norway to provide international assistance in implementing the REDD+ scheme. This research was conducted using qualitative research methods to analyze Norway's international aid based on the concept of international aid and the effectiveness of international aid in the failure of peat forest restoration in Indonesia. Four Norwegian aid funding mechanisms through NICFI failed to reduce carbon emissions by 41%, following the provisions of the Letter of Intent (LoI) on REDD+ agreed upon by Indonesia and Norway in 2009. The reason is that Norway's national interests are mixed with international aid provided, so that is Self-Interest following the dimensions of international assistance. This also makes the effectiveness of international assistance insignificant even though it is following the five principles of the Paris Declaration on Aids Effectiveness. Keywords: REDD+, International Aid Concept, International Aid Effectiveness Concept, Funding Mechanism, Self-Interest, and Carbon Emissions
References
Audun Ruud, Sustainable Development Discourse in Norway, L’Europe, 2009, pages 143-155
Central Bureau of Statistics, “Indonesian Deforestation Figures inside and outside forest areas 2015-2020, bps.go.id, accessed in August 2022
Directorate General of Climate Change Control, “Regarding BP REDD+”, ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id, < http://ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id/berita-ppi/33-beranda/1847-mengenai-bp-redd.html >, accessed on June 7, 2022
Directorate General of Climate Change Control. “Result-Based Payments: Ways and Means”. ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id. http://ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id/dari-media/365-result-based-payments-ways-and-means.html. Retrieved August 2022
Directorate General of Climate Change Control. Regulations and Policies Related to Climate Change. ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id. accessed in August 2022
K. Ridwan. 2021. Definition of Case Studies: Types, How to Make, and Examples. Deepublish Book Publisher.com. https://penerbitbukudeepublish.com/pengertian-studi-case/, accessed on 26 April 2022.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry, “Successful in Reducing Deforestation, Indonesia Receives Funds from Norway”, ppid.menlhk.go.id, 20 May 2020, NUMBER: SP. 208/HUMAS/PP/HMS.3/5/2020, <http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/5445/berhasil-tekan-deforestasi-indonesia-untung-dana-dari-norwegia >, accessed on July 21, 2020
Ministry of Environment and Forestry, “Indonesia: Manage Peat With Integration of Public Policy” ppid.menlhk.go.id, 6 July 2021, Number: SP.215/HUMAS/PP/HMS.3/07/2021, <http: //ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/6042/indonesia-kelola-gambut-dengan-integration-policy-bersama-community>, accessed on 18 July 2022
Ministry of Environment and Forestry, “Knowledge Climate Change Canter”, ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id, < http://ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id/kcpi/index.php/aksi/mitigas/implementasi/10-about>, accessed on 25 July 2022
Ministry of Environment and Forestry, "RI-Norway Strengthens REDD+ and Environment Cooperation", dataalam.menlhk.go.id, 13 February 2019, <https://dataalam.menlhk.go.id/berita/2019/02/13/ ri-norway-strengthens-cooperation-redd-and-lh>, accessed 18 July 2022
Kusnandar, V. B. (2019, August). This is Deforestation in Indonesia for the 1990-2017 Period. Databox.https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/08/20/inilah-deforestasi-di-indonesia-period-1990-2017.
LTS International. 2018. Third independent review of the Indonesia-Norway cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from REDD+
Mahottama, S. (2011).Analysis of Reducing Poverty in Indonesia. University of Indonesia.
Maryani, R., Agung, P., & Suyanto. (2012).REDD+ in Indonesia: a Historical Perspective.
NORAD, 2011, Norad, Real-Time Evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, Contribution to National REDD+ Process 2007-2010, Country Report: Brazil, Indonesia, Guyana, and Tanzania.
REDD-Monitor Organization. 2019. Norway is planning to pay Indonesia for fudging its REDD carbon accounting. redd.monitor.org. https://redd-monitor.org/2019/03/27/norway-pays-indonesia-for-fudging-its-redd-carbon-accounting/. Diakses pada Agustus 2022.
Rekha, R., Damayanti, C., & Wijayati, H. (2021). Failure of Indonesia-Australia Cooperation in Addressing Gas Emissions Through the Kalimantan Forest Climate Partnership (Kfcp) Project. JISIP-UNJA, 5(1), 83–97.
Rispalman. (2018). History of the Development of Environmental Law in Indonesia. Dusturiah, 8(2), 185–196.
Rosana, M. (2018). Insightful Sustainable Development Policy Environment In Indonesia.MANAGE Journal, 1(Journal of Social Sciences), 154–159.
Saryono. (2013). Qualitative and quantitative research methodologies: In the health sector. Nuha Medika
Wicaksono, D., & P. Yurista, A. (2013). Participatory Forest Conservation Through REDD+ (Case Study of Central Kalimantan as a REDD+ Pilot Province).Regional and Environmental Journal, 1 (2), 189–200.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
